I conducted an ab-initio docking analysis on the E2A-HPR complex using haddock3. I selected this protein complex based on its inclusion as an example in your HADDOCK2.4 documentation. This choice facilitated a comparison of the scoring metrics, allowing me to assess whether my ab-initio protocol is optimal and capable of reproducing similar results to those presented in your documentation.
Upon comparing my results with yours, I observed discrepancies in the output. Specifically, my output lacks information on the z-score and Restraints Violation Energy. I have attached a screenshot of my output for your reference.
Additionally, I have a question regarding the “restraints energy” score in my results, which is recorded as 0. I couldn’t find information in the HADDOCK documentation explaining the meaning of the “restraints energy” score and what a value of 0 indicates. Could you please provide clarification on this matter?
@amjjbonvin
Thank you, Professor, for your prompt response. I initially employed a center of mass for restraining energy; however, I would like to provide an example of my ab-initio protocol. I hope this example will help you further clarify the concept of restraint energy scores for me.
@amjjbonvin
According to my understanding of restraint energy in the fields of molecular docking and molecular dynamics, restraint energy is generally associated with the energy resulting from constraints applied during simulation to replicate experimental information or known structures. This helps guide simulations towards more realistic conformations or explore specific interactions. Therefore, do you think it is necessary to add them to my protocol? Considering that I have chosen to perform ab-initio docking as I have no experimental information on the proteins I wish to study.
What I mean is, can we do without it? If we don’t apply restraint energy to the emref and mdref phases, will my results and analyses be biased?