I had an assignment to dock Clarithromycin with two 23s rRNA ( one wild and one mutant )… I used HADDOCK 2.4 for this propose, with all default values. After getting the results I got 3 cluster for mutant and one for wild type and some graphical representation.
My question are-
- Was my approach correct?
- Why I hadn’t get equal no of clusters for both.
- How do I interpret which is the best cluster? and there are 4 structure in each cluster, so I do I know which structure is best in a respective cluster?
- What is the correct way to interpret the graphical data’s?
- For wild type my Z score was 0, but in mutant I got there there cluster and three z scores 1.3, -0.2, -1.1? which should i take? cause my hypothesis was "there will be better binding with wild type than mutant ".
I had an assignment to dock Clarithromycin with two 23s rRNA ( one wild and one mutant )… I used HADDOCK 2.4 for this propose, with all default values. After getting the results I got 3 cluster for mutant and one for wild type and some graphical representation.
First question is what kind of data did you use to guide the docking?
- Why I hadn’t get equal no of clusters for both.
Depends on the docking results.
- How do I interpret which is the best cluster? and there are 4 structure in each cluster, so I do I know which structure is best in a respective cluster?
Based on the HADDOCK core and and the first model within one cluster is always the one with the best (lowest) HADDOCK score.
- What is the correct way to interpret the graphical data’s?
- For wild type my Z score was 0, but in mutant I got there there cluster and three z scores 1.3, -0.2, -1.1? which should i take? cause my hypothesis was "there will be better binding with wild type than mutant “.
The z-score is purely a statistical measure. By definition if there is only one cluster it is 0. If two clusters, it will be +1 and -1.
I.e. should not be used to select clusters. It only tells you how many standard deviations is a cluster from the average score of all clusters
1 Like
Thank you for your reply and time. I think I understand the ans of my 2,3,4 & 5 th question. but please tell me my approach was correct…
But how do you define the interface then?
Default settings do require the definition of active residues.
Or did you do ab-initio docking?
I selected 1st 200 nucleotide as active residue as that was the limit showed there…
I.e. no information… In that case better to use the ab-initio mode of HADDOCK with centre of mass restraints
You will also have to increase the sampling.
Needs guru access.
Check out haddock2.4 tutorials are bonvinlab.org/education
Thank you so much for your guidance. I will try Ab-initio then…
Thank you So much for this Guidance… I will try ab initio then…