I’m going through the second part of this tutorial to do protein-ligand docking where I’m trying to use the provided GenTBL tool. However, every time I press ‘Submit’ at the bottom of the page, I get an Internal Server Error message. Can anyone explain what the problem might be or if I’m using the tool incorrectly?
Here are my inputs:
Selection 1 Active Residues: 101,104,105,111,114,115,139,143,191,192,195,196,198,199,202,203,229,265,266,279,282,283,286,292
Segment 1 ID: A
Selection 2 Active Residues: 1
Segment 2 ID: B
Thank you for responding. Yes, that is the link I used. I tried submitting with both Chrome and Firefox, but I encounter the same error. Here is a screenshot:
I tried using the LigParGen server because the PRODRG server renumbers atoms to names with a colon in it which CNS cannot handle. However, when using the TOP and PAR files from LigParGen, HADDOCK gives an “Error in the topology generation: prot_psf_mol2 could not be created” error. From generate_2.out the error causing this appears to be
%CODIMP-ERR: missing improper parameters
improper energy constant missing.
target improper value missing.
periodicity missing.
which is very strange, because the TOP file by LigParGen does contain
Some obvious differences between the TOP and PAR files from PRODRG and those from LigParGen are:
PRODRG chooses autogenerate angles=false while LigParGen uses autogenerate angles=true dihedrals=true. Can CNS/HADDOCK cope with having to autogenerate these?
The ligand contains 14 carbon atoms and 2 nitrogen atoms. The files from PRODRG thus contain 16 IMPR lines. The files from LigParGen list two IMPR lines for some carbon and nitrogen atoms, resulting in 27 lines. I wonder if this is the problem/inconsistency in the file. Am I right that only one improper angle per chiral atom is needed?
The GitHub for LigParGen seems abandoned, so I don’t know if it’s useful to try to contact the maker of LigParGen. It’s disappointing that this doesn’t work though, because the server is really easy to use.