# Metrics for the Evaluation of Docking Model Quality

**URL:** <https://ask.bioexcel.eu/t/metrics-for-the-evaluation-of-docking-model-quality/4294>\
**Category:** Uncategorized\
**Created:** [May 1, 2023, 9:22pm UTC](https://ask.bioexcel.eu/t/metrics-for-the-evaluation-of-docking-model-quality/4294 "2023-05-01T21:22:38Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pei](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/a698b9/32.png) [@pei](https://ask.bioexcel.eu/u/pei)\
**Post date:** [May 2, 2023, 4:35pm UTC](https://ask.bioexcel.eu/t/metrics-for-the-evaluation-of-docking-model-quality/4294/5 "2023-05-02T16:35:40Z")

</div>

Thank you amjjbonvin!  
after read some literature, it looked like HADDOCK 2.2 was supposed to generate protein–DNA complex model(s) with available experimental data, like NMR spectroscopy.  
If I only have predicted protein and DNA 3D structure, it looked like HADDOCK may not be very helpful in my case.  
Am I right?  
Thanks!

---

_[View the full topic](https://ask.bioexcel.eu/t/metrics-for-the-evaluation-of-docking-model-quality/4294)._